Sperm Decline/Environmental Estrogen Link?
By Sean Henahan, Access Excellence
Bethesda,
MD (11/24/97) The 30 year decline in average sperm density reported
in the U.S. and other Western countries appears to be even greater than
previously indicated, suggests a major reanalysis of international data.
The National Institutes of Health will now begin measuring American's exposure
to environmental estrogen, which has been implicated in the declining sperm
counts.
Researchers at the California Department of Health Services conducted
an extensive review of data from 61 published studies, representing sperm
density information gathered from 1938 to 1990. This review shows that
sperm densities in the United States have declined every year during that
period, with an average annual decrease of 1.5 million sperm per milliliter
of collected sample, or about 1.5 percent per year. Sperm densities in
European countries have declined at about twice that rate (3.1 percent
per year).
A review of the same 61 studies published in 1992 (E. Carlsen,
et al.; British Medical Journal, vol. 305, page 609) also showed a 50 year
trend in declining sperm counts, but not quite as dramatic. The California
researchers noticed that these studies did not take into account such factors
as the age of the subjects, the length of abstinence prior to sample collection, and method of sample collection. Any of
these factors could have influenced the observed trend.
"Most of the critics have suggested ways in which the data analysis
might be skewed, but no one has ever looked at the data from these earlier
studies to see whether these hypothetical biases are actually present,"
noted epidemiologist Shanna Swan.
Swan and colleagues utilized statistical modeling to correct for individual
differences in these key variables as well as geographic area, and then
reanalyzed the data from 56 of the studies cited in the 1992 paper. Three
non-English language studies and two others that included men who had conceived
only after an infertility work-up were excluded from the new analysis.
While the results of their analyses also showed a significant decline
in sperm density, it was the rate of the decline,
particularly in Western countries, that was most surprising. "We observed
a decrease of about 1.5 million sperm per
milliliter per year in the United States, and a corresponding decrease
of about 3 million sperm per year in Europe,"
reports Swan.
There is still no evidence that this apparent decline in sperm density
has led to reduced fertility. However, sperm count may be a surrogate indicator
of effects on the male reproductive system. The researchers note that in
countries such as Denmark, England and the United States, where sperm
counts have fallen, the incidence of
testicular cancer has increased dramatically over the last 25 years,
while in Finland, where sperm counts are still
relatively high, testicular cancer rates have remained low.
There has been a flurry of recent research looking of the potential
relationship between exposure to environmental pollutants and declining
sperm quality. In one study, researchers reported a significant correlation
between lowered sperm densities and increased levels of organochlorine
compounds in the subjects' seminal fluid. In another, investigators found
that a general decline in sperm concentration during the years 1949 to
1981 was statistically linked to an overall increase in several environmental
exposures, including environmental estrogen.
NEW FEDERAL STUDY
The National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention's National
Center for Environmental Health have just launched a study of blood and
urine samples to determine the
amount of exposure that Americans have to environmental estrogens.
In sufficient amounts, these chemicals can act like the female hormone
estrogen. Although the effects of any
exposure are unknown, some scientists have suggested that environmental
estrogens might be reducing sperm counts
in men and causing breast cancer, fibroids and other reproductive diseases
in women. At present, scientists know
little about which of the environmental estrogens people are exposed
to and how much exposure they have. The
new study will address these questions.
"This kind of assessment of exposure to environmental estrogens is absolutely
critical to the scientifically credible assessment of potential health
risk from these compounds. The study builds on CDC's long-standing expertise
in measuring toxic substances in people's blood and urine and is a valuable
public health collaboration with NIEHS." Richard J. Jackson, M.D., director
of CDC's National Center for Environmental Health, said.
The study will measure approximately 50 environmental estrogens in
200 persons to determine the level of exposure to the population. Among
the more familiar chemicals that will be tested are: insecticides such
as arsenic, dieldrin, mirex, lindane, parathion, and DDT and its metabolics;
herbicides such as 2,4-D, alachlor and atrazine; nematocides such as aldricarb;
fungicides, plant and fungal estrogens, and industrial chemicals such as
cadmium, lead, mercury, PCBs, and dioxins.
"This project will give us an idea of human exposure to each of the
chemicals and help us set priorities for the studies done in the National
Toxicology Program. Comparing the levels with other health and toxicity
data, we should be able to determine if some of the higher exposures we
find are linked to increased incidences of disease." said George Lucier,
Ph.D., coordinator for the research project.
The research appears in the November 1997 issue of Environmental Health
Perspectives, the monthly scientific journal published by the National
Institute of Environmental Health Sciences.
|
|